Don't be afraid to stand up for something when you know you should stand up for it," said Teresa Matthews. This is about me speaking truth to power.”Īnd as for those “working folks” Matthews says deserve better, he says he and Teresa are willing to take the lead, and hope others join. "Once the Deputy Mayor, in my view had done that God-awful interview with you, Lisa, she was being extremely arrogant to me, had no compassion for working folks out here going to work, talking their kids to school, or what have you,” said Matthews. It didn't take long for the Matthews to decide to anchor a class-action lawsuit against the District. Her office declined, stating that "District government does not comment on active litigation matters." There's no other way to dress this up than for what it is,'" Matthew said. We asked the Deputy Mayor of Operations and Infrastructure, Lucinda Babers, to sit down and talk with us about Title 18 as well as allegations made in the lawsuit.
#Traffic camera washington dc drivers
All agreed that the traffic and engineering investigation the law requires would not have been optional and its absence raises legal questions. The mayor’s proposed budget would deploy new cameras to target drivers who use bike and bus lanes, and pass school buses. We made inquiries of several attorneys to get their reading of Title 18 2200.2. We were assured our FOIA request was properly filed and written and while it was clearly understood what we were seeking, there was no such report. We followed up with a phone call to make certain we weren't missing anything. Through the Freedom of Information Act, we requested a copy of that investigation and were told by the FOIA Administrator that it does not exist.
Not only that, but we discovered the act of lowering of the speed limit may have been done illegally, according to the District's own laws.Īccording to Title 18 2200.2, a decision to raise or lower the speed limit is made on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation. “So we're talking about May 2019 to late 2019, early 2020 when that area was designated a work zone where no work was taking place and the tickets were doing nothing but generating revenue for the city.” “The work in the construction zone ended in May of 2019 and our clients were ticketed in November,” said Mason. Drivers will soon be able to pick cams up at designated locations.Those guidelines say there should be multiple signs alerting drivers to a work zone and when the work is over, signs should come down and regular speed limits resumed. The city expects to get these dashcams out to eligible drivers in the same fashion as the Wheel Lock Program the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) hosted in February. ".so this is about using every tool at our disposal." "What our partners of law enforcement tell us, is that video evidence is crucial in solving crimes and closing cases and also deterring crimes," Bowser added. RELATED | DC Crime: More than 100 homicides so far this year, highest in 20 years This new initiative for rideshare and food delivery drivers will mirror the Private Security Camera Incentive Program's protocol of participation.īowser said the program has even helped law enforcement with investigation efforts as the city's crime numbers continue to climb. The city's Private Security Camera Incentive Program has already spearheaded the installation of over 26,000 cameras at various homes and businesses in the District. "So for drivers who come to restaurants.to pick up orders, drop off dinners and we want them to be able to do that with more security," D.C.
0 kommentar(er)
